Imagine this. You need one tiny detail buried deep in a 20-page internal policy. Or maybe a product decision made months ago, referenced once in a Slack thread… somewhere. You know someone probably has the answer - maybe even documented it - but you’re not sure where to look. So, do you ask? Or do you spend 20 minutes searching, scanning, second-guessing? It’s a dilemma you’ve probably faced a hundred times - and each time, you tell yourself it’s easier to figure it out than to risk asking something “stupid.” But what if that hesitation is costing your organization more than you realize? Why asking isn’t equal There’s a big difference in how asking questions plays out depending on who’s doing the asking. If you’re a manager, asking a question feels… easy. You fire off a message. People respond. Fast. Your time is seen as expensive - your request gets priority. No one questions whether your ask is valid. Even if it’s simple. Even if it's been answered before. Now imagine you're...
You’ve just solved a tricky problem at work - something that took hours of research, trial and error, and maybe a few Slack messages to your go-to colleagues. It finally clicks. You move on. You think, "I should probably write this down. Might be useful for others." But then the next task rolls in. The urgency of your to-do list trumps the noble idea of documenting what you just learned. And so, like most people, you don’t. And when someone on your team hits the same roadblock a week later, they go through the same process all over again. Sound familiar? Knowledge Sharing: Great in Theory, Awkward in Practice We all agree that knowledge sharing is a good thing. It boosts team productivity, reduces duplication of effort, and helps onboard new hires faster. That’s why organizations invest in tools: wikis, SOPs, documentation platforms, webinars, internal newsletters, learning systems... the list goes on. But even with all these resources, people still ask the same questions. Th...